· Apply model to an example of communication. How widely
is it applicable?
· What are the main commutative functions of redundancy?
What do we mean when we say 50% of the English language is redundant?
· Discuss the ways in which convention can be said to facilitate
understanding and visual communication that breaks or extends specific
conventions. How does this affect the desire to communicate or the audience
they reach?
The
Shannon-Weaver Mathematical Model applied to Yorkie’s ‘It’s not for
girls’ campaign:
The
first step in the model is the ‘information source’ that, when looking at
design, is the original subject, concept or idea that wants to be conveyed. The
idea behind Yorkie’s campaign is to change the brand, moving away from
convention and sell their product.
Launched
in 2002, the campaign was released in an effort to move away from the very
feminine adverts more commonly associated with chocolate – such as Galaxy. The
idea was to completely contrast with the romantic, sexy, female driven
advertising that was the usual.
To
transmit this information Yorkie needed to create and adjust the company’s
visual image – showing and emphasizing that their chocolate was a masculine
product.
The
visual communication was targeted at both males and females, although the
message was different. The message suggested to the males was one of power and
masculinity, however, it was not direct. There were no direct images or slogans
that implied any of this, instead it was suggested through the message directed
at the women. The message directed at the women was that this product was not
for them, it was not something indulgent or sexy and therefore should not be
consumed by them.
This
was a very bold and highly controversial decision by Yorkie as it could have
potentially lost a large proportion of their customers. The campaign had two
main elements: the more subliminal male driven side that is generated by the
though that “if it is not for girls then it must be form men” and the
provocative female side that this product is not for you. The design all chose
to focus on the later, with all the packaging, logos, slogans and advertising
campaigns telling women it isn’t for them.
The
medium by which the idea and design was communicated was very basic and simple.
Yorkie redesigned their logo, changed the slogan and brought out an entirely
new advertising campaign. This changed most of the visual identity of the brand
but it also changed the ethos and attitude associated with the company.
The
logo was adapted so that the ‘o’ in Yorkie became a no-women symbol and each
chocolate bar was adorned with the slogan ‘IT’S NOT FOR GIRLS!’. The
advertisements followed in a similar suit, using phrases such as ‘SAVE YOUR
MONEY FOR DRIVING LESSONS’. This very stereotypical suggestion, that women are
bad drivers, again focuses on the women rather than the men.
The
audience that this communication is aimed at is somewhat ominous. Although it
is possible to say that it is aimed at getting men to eat their product, none
of the visual data is aimed at men at all.
All
the adverts are aimed at women telling them not to buy the product. This was a
very risky strategy as they could lose a lot of customers. Without any
direct/obvious audience and offending any potential female customers, Yorkie
could have lost a significant amount of money.
The
impact this advert had was very mixed. The main aim – to get men eating the
chocolate – was accomplished as men chose it over the more feminine chocolate
bars. It also created a divide, as some women saw it as offensively sexist and
therefore refused to buy it, where as others bought it as an act of rebellion
against the company. The campaign caused a large amount of controversy and was
banned in several places.
This
advert is difficult do section into either a redundant act or an entropic act.
The overall campaign has redundant qualities such as a large audience; it was
very simple, understandable and readable. It had a low amount of information
and was mass-produced, however, it was unpredictable and unconventional, both
of which are characteristically entropic. It was also quite a shocking campaign
and got the audience to think and question, again entropic characteristics.
This
campaign created its own noise through its somewhat offensive nature. This was
quite possible the aim of the campaign although it did interfere as there were companies
and areas that would not display/show the adverts and they were banned. The noise
was also a positive as, as soon as you tell someone they are not allowed it
there instinctive act is to want it, getting people to buy and consume the
products.
No comments:
Post a Comment